There is an an interesting comment thread happening over on the FXPAL blog, about the differences between social search and collaborative search:
http://palblog.fxpal.com/?p=350#comments
|
|||||
|
There is an an interesting comment thread happening over on the FXPAL blog, about the differences between social search and collaborative search: Continued from Part 1. Last week I attended the O’Reilly eTech conference. The first night, Tim O’Reilly gave his annual Radar talk, in which he surveys the technology landscape and comments on upcoming and interesting trends. I have heard this Radar talk for years, via the IT Conversations podcast network, but this was the first time I’d seen it [...] Over on the FXPAL blog, Gene and I added the 2nd of a series of posts mapping out the collaborative information seeking systems domain. Here is an excerpt: Daniel makes a provocative statement: I just want to announce that over on the FXPAL blog, Gene Golovchinsky and I are starting a series of posts about what we think it means to collaborate during the information seeking process. There are many different dimensions and scenarios, and many other researchers that have looked at this problem as well. We are [...] I first became fascinated with the relationship between computers, information, language, and emotion back in 1984 when I read an Analog article about a computer than had been used to automatically generate poetry. A week later, I was on my father’s IBM PC, writing a Basic program on (if memory serves me correctly) Dos 2.1 [...] I was listening recently to a podcast on IT Conversations, published 1/17/2009, entitled “Creating Passionate Users”. It is a conversation between Tim O’Reilly and Kathy Sierra. Google has had somewhat of an odd relationship over the years to music information, and music information retrieval. They’ve never really had a consistent policy, research, or product agenda around music. The specifics of that history is too rich to recount in its entirety here; if readers are interested, perhaps that can be the subject [...] Sometimes, the story is as good as the moral. Sometimes, the journey is as good as the destination. So in Information Retrieval, why are we too often satisfied with producing results, but not with explaining how the results were arrived at? |
|||||
|
Copyright © 2010 Information Retrieval Gupf - All Rights Reserved |
|||||
Recent Comments