-
Recent Posts
- A Button Without The Treat
- They Won People Over By A Logical Argument
- Workshop on Collaborative Information Retrieval (CIR 2011)
- +1 is Explicit, but is not Relevance Feedback
- Top Posts of 2010
- Close the Loop!
- Search Algorithms versus Asimov’s First Law of Robotics
- Miffed and Confused
- The Search User Wants a Story
Recent Comments
- jeremy on A Button Without The Treat
- Jens on A Button Without The Treat
- jeremy on A Button Without The Treat
- Jon on A Button Without The Treat
- A Button Without The Treat « Information Retrieval Gupf on +1 is Explicit, but is not Relevance Feedback
- They Won People Over By A Logical Argument « Information Retrieval Gupf on +1 is Explicit, but is not Relevance Feedback
- jeremy on +1 is Explicit, but is not Relevance Feedback
- jeremy on +1 is Explicit, but is not Relevance Feedback
- Sam on +1 is Explicit, but is not Relevance Feedback
- FXPAL Blog » Blog Archive » Released: Reverted Indexing source code on About
- Dinesh Vadhia on Top Posts of 2010
- jeremy on Search Algorithms versus Asimov’s First Law of Robotics
- jeremy on Miffed and Confused
- Bob Carpenter on Search Algorithms versus Asimov’s First Law of Robotics
- Bob Carpenter on Miffed and Confused
Monthly Archives: December 2010
Top Posts of 2010
Here are the five top posts on this blog for 2010, in order: Kasparov and Good Interaction Design Search Versus Recommendation: Not the Only Tension More on Simplicity and the Paradox of Choice What You Can Find Out Don’t Forget … Continue reading
Posted in General
5 Comments
Close the Loop!
The web is abuzz this week with talk of the Google Books Ngram Viewer. It’s a great tool, and leads to some very interesting exploration and trend visualization. So does this tool fly in the face of my rant from … Continue reading
Posted in Exploratory Search
2 Comments
Search Algorithms versus Asimov’s First Law of Robotics
Search Engine Land has a short article on bias versus brands. The issue at hand is whether Google Instant has a brand bias. Google says it does not: Singhal explains that when someone types in T, mathematically “most people typing … Continue reading
Posted in Information Retrieval Foundations
4 Comments
Miffed and Confused
Have been on a six month blogging hiatus, and wouldn’t you know it.. it took another fun Google article to pull me back. It is a recent FastCompany piece, entitled Google to Zuckerberg, Bing: We Still Innovate. The premise of … Continue reading