|
|
A number of people have already written about the Sue Dumais “Salton Award” talk at SIGIR. I encourage you to read their posts, and in particular pay attention to the emphasis that she put on her work at the intersection of HCI and IR. I see this area as only continuing to grow over [...]
I just finished reading a though provoking post from Anil Dash, about how Google’s recent Chrome OS announcement signifies an important moment:
This is, for lack of a better term, Google’s “Microsoft Moment”. This is the point when the difference between their internal conception of the company starts to diverge just a bit too far from the public perception of the company, and even starts to diverge from reality. At this inflection point, the reasons for doing new things at Google start to change.
Dash gives a number of explanations for why he believes this moment has arrived. The first observation that struck me was about Google’s attitude toward self-promotion. For its entire company history, Google has proudly and vocally called attention to the fact that it does not advertise its own services; its products speak for themselves and are spread by word-of-mouth and by reputation alone. That is the self-declared “Googly” way. This was not just early days rhetoric, spoken only when the company was young. As recently as last year’s SIGIR 2008 conference in Singapore, Googler Kai Fu Lee explicitly stated during his keynote speech the fact that Google does not self-advertise. But this, Dash says, is changing. Now there are slick television ads for Chrome. There are highly promoted developer conferences for Android. And just two days before Kai Fu Lee gave his SIGIR talk, categorically declaring that Google never self-advertises, I was at a San Francisco Giants game and saw a large, LED banner advertisement for Google Transit. This change has an effect on the public perception of the company. Dash writes:
This would be okay, except that I doubt Google’s internal self-image as an organization has changed to reflect this new reality. “We’re not like some giant company with flashy TV ads — we’re just a bunch of geeks in Mountain View!” And while that might be true for the vast number of engineers who define the company’s internal culture, the external impression of Google being just another tech titan like Microsoft will gain footing, making the audience for Google’s messages less tolerant of ambiguity and less forgiving of mistakes…Google has made commendable steps towards communicating with those outside of its sphere of influence in the tech world. But the messages will be incomplete or insufficient as long as Google doesn’t truly internalize and accept that its public perception is about to change radically. The era of Google as a trusted, “non-evil” startup whose actions are automatically assumed to be benevolent is over.
Now, you might ask: What does all this have to do with this Information Retrieval blog? Continue reading…
I’ve been rather quiet on the blog as of late, and that will probably continue for a while. My summer has been much busier than expected. In the meantime, I’ll share a short sketch that I recently came across, entitled “Googling with Bing“. Enjoy.
Much ado has been made today in the blogosphere about the newly announced (but 1.5 years from being shipped) Chrome OS from that search engine company, Google. Here is an excerpt from the announcement:
We designed Google Chrome for people who live on the web — searching for information, checking email, catching up on the news, shopping or just staying in touch with friends. However, the operating systems that browsers run on were designed in an era where there was no web. So today, we’re announcing a new project that’s a natural extension of Google Chrome — the Google Chrome Operating System. It’s our attempt to re-think what operating systems should be.
This reminds me of a long-standing debate that I’ve had with a few of my colleagues at work, about the relative value of browser-based web apps, versus desktop-based, internet-enabled apps. Chrome does not end this debate, but I see it as a step in the latter direction.
There is a big, big question that I have about all this, though. And it’s something that I’ve not seen in the dozens of official and unofficial blogposts that I’ve read so far today. And that issue is one of hardware compatibility. A real operating system has to interface with external devices, and accommodate all types of information captured and collected by the user. Yes, it’s true that more and more people are living their entire digital lives on the internet, and that much of what they do involves browsing, viewing, and sharing of information within a web context.
However, in order to get that information onto the web in the first place, there needs to be some sort of user-facing hardware that captures that information. A physical keyboard (or touchscreen keyboard) are pieces of hardware for capturing text information. And a camera is a piece of hardware for capturing image information. So my question is: If the ChromeOS is to serve as the operating system for my computer, will I be able to plug my camera into that computer, and upload the files from the camera to the web, in such a form that others can view those images? Continue reading…
|
|
Recent Comments