<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About</title>
	<atom:link href="http://irgupf.com/about/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://irgupf.com</link>
	<description>Information Retrieval Research, Issues, and Discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 05:40:49 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FXPAL Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Help isn&#8217;t all we need</title>
		<link>http://irgupf.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-25898</link>
		<dc:creator>FXPAL Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Help isn&#8217;t all we need</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiakli.net/?page_id=2#comment-25898</guid>
		<description>[...] Jeremy scooped me in his recent post where he commented on a recent SXSW panel on social search that included Marc Vermut, Brynn Evans, Max Ventilla, Ash Rust, and Scott Prindle. Jeremy pointed out that in addition to asking for help and embarking on a solitary search, was the possibility (discussed many times on this blog) of embarking on (an exploratory) search together. Searching together, collaboratively, is often appropriate when faced with exploratory (rather than known-item, factiod, or trending topic) information needs. Collaboration works best when information needs are shared, and when the results need to be created rather than merely re-discovered. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jeremy scooped me in his recent post where he commented on a recent SXSW panel on social search that included Marc Vermut, Brynn Evans, Max Ventilla, Ash Rust, and Scott Prindle. Jeremy pointed out that in addition to asking for help and embarking on a solitary search, was the possibility (discussed many times on this blog) of embarking on (an exploratory) search together. Searching together, collaboratively, is often appropriate when faced with exploratory (rather than known-item, factiod, or trending topic) information needs. Collaboration works best when information needs are shared, and when the results need to be created rather than merely re-discovered. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magic glasses and magic projectors: Private versus public augmentation of experience &#171; Jon Udell</title>
		<link>http://irgupf.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-4953</link>
		<dc:creator>Magic glasses and magic projectors: Private versus public augmentation of experience &#171; Jon Udell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiakli.net/?page_id=2#comment-4953</guid>
		<description>[...] in the thread, Jeremy Pickens cited an example of such a contract: Google&#8217;s terms of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the thread, Jeremy Pickens cited an example of such a contract: Google&#8217;s terms of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
