<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search versus Recommendation: Not The Only Tension</title>
	<atom:link href="http://irgupf.com/2010/01/05/more-tensions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://irgupf.com/2010/01/05/more-tensions/</link>
	<description>Information Retrieval Research, Issues, and Discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:26:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: waqas</title>
		<link>http://irgupf.com/2010/01/05/more-tensions/comment-page-1/#comment-6861</link>
		<dc:creator>waqas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irgupf.com/?p=1131#comment-6861</guid>
		<description>YouTube wants to get from users spending “15 minutes a day on the site” closer to the “five hours in front of the television.”
i am totally agree with you on this. we can save our time and also can entertained ourselves by suggesting to youtube about our choice. can you tell me either the youtube will allow all kind of movies and clips for the users?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YouTube wants to get from users spending “15 minutes a day on the site” closer to the “five hours in front of the television.”<br />
i am totally agree with you on this. we can save our time and also can entertained ourselves by suggesting to youtube about our choice. can you tell me either the youtube will allow all kind of movies and clips for the users?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Search &#38; Social News: 01/12/2010 &#124; Search Engine Journal</title>
		<link>http://irgupf.com/2010/01/05/more-tensions/comment-page-1/#comment-6807</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Search &#38; Social News: 01/12/2010 &#124; Search Engine Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irgupf.com/?p=1131#comment-6807</guid>
		<description>[...] Search versus Recommendation: Not The Only Tension &#8211; Information Retrieval Gupf [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Search versus Recommendation: Not The Only Tension &#8211; Information Retrieval Gupf [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy</title>
		<link>http://irgupf.com/2010/01/05/more-tensions/comment-page-1/#comment-6663</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irgupf.com/?p=1131#comment-6663</guid>
		<description>Oh yes, good point!  Hmmm.. does my taxonomy hold up, in that context?  Is there a fruitful tension between standing queries/alerts and exploratory search?  I&#039;ll have to think about that some more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes, good point!  Hmmm.. does my taxonomy hold up, in that context?  Is there a fruitful tension between standing queries/alerts and exploratory search?  I&#8217;ll have to think about that some more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Golovchinsky</title>
		<link>http://irgupf.com/2010/01/05/more-tensions/comment-page-1/#comment-6660</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Golovchinsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irgupf.com/?p=1131#comment-6660</guid>
		<description>Standing queries (such as Google Alerts) are another example of a passive, well-understood need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Standing queries (such as Google Alerts) are another example of a passive, well-understood need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

