<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Compare Google Yahoo Bing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://irgupf.com/2009/06/08/compare-google-yahoo-bing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://irgupf.com/2009/06/08/compare-google-yahoo-bing/</link>
	<description>Information Retrieval Research, Issues, and Discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:26:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Carpenter</title>
		<link>http://irgupf.com/2009/06/08/compare-google-yahoo-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-2522</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Carpenter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irgupf.com/?p=681#comment-2522</guid>
		<description>I did my own evaluations using my real searches over a day or two and found Bing and Google neck-and-neck, with some clear advantages one way or the other in verticals (Bing on travel, Google on software).  What surprised me on the blind searches is that Yahoo! does so well.

I was wondering about bias the other way around, when I started using Google syntax on Bing.  I realized Bing was pretty much forced into doing things Google&#039;s way to support existing search habits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did my own evaluations using my real searches over a day or two and found Bing and Google neck-and-neck, with some clear advantages one way or the other in verticals (Bing on travel, Google on software).  What surprised me on the blind searches is that Yahoo! does so well.</p>
<p>I was wondering about bias the other way around, when I started using Google syntax on Bing.  I realized Bing was pretty much forced into doing things Google&#8217;s way to support existing search habits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

